| |
Painting
is my way of making sense of my experiences and research. Ultimately
the paintings I make become my own myths, metaphors and equivalences:
basically, stories.
Currently, I’m exploring words and writing; making meaning and
failure to do so; how even in the unlikely event of our words being
well-chosen, the instability of language can thwart communication.
I’m also thinking about how we may make absurd connections and
structures, which become real to us and influence later perceptions.
I’m wondering whether it’s possible to separate signifier
and signified to make a signifier of the signifier, or whether that
always makes another signified? In my paintings, I am starting with
quotes on the subject of foundational meaning and the impossibility
thereof and following non-logical systems to produce new forms from
these phrases, which in turn suggest other possible meanings.
Ideas right now are: Nietzsche’s will to power: the making of
metaphor to impose order on chaos; many of Derrida’s ideas:
the impossibility of fundamental or ultimate assignation of meaning;
the endless play of signifiers and deferment of meaning; and Baudrillard’s
hypertelia: infinite proliferation of meanings. |
|
|